

"We recognize that the pharmaceutical industry has varying opinions regarding government policy. However, the government designs policy by looking at where the public's expectations lie and what their interests are. The necessity of fostering the pharmaceutical industry and the fact that domestic generic drug prices are high are areas where society relatively shares a consensus, and social agreement is required. We are not setting a single specific drug pricing reform plan and trying to force it through. We will repeatedly collect and discuss opinions from the pharmaceutical industry. Since policy can change at any time, there is room to modify the reform plan."
Lee Hyung-hoon, Second Vice Minister of Health and Welfare (60, Yonsei University), has drawn significant attention by highlighting the difficulties of reconciling diverse interests in a single policy for drug pricing reform, which primarily focuses on lowering the prices of previously-listed generic drugs.
Lee stated that, given South Korea's adoption and operation of a single-payer National Health Insurance system, writing a reform plan that simultaneously achieves the goals of fostering the pharmaceutical industry and ensuring efficient, rational national pharmaceutical expenditures requires considering the interests of both the industry and the public as beneficiaries of health insurance.
Meeting with the Korea Special Press Association on the 18th, Vice Minister Lee promised, "Rather than taking the stance of a policy authority, the Ministry of Health and Welfare designs policy by examining public interests. However, we have not finished setting a single drug pricing reform plan. Policy is open and can continue to change. We will communicate with the pharmaceutical industry."
This was the Vice Minister's response when asked how the Ministry intends to resolve the industry's backlash against the drug pricing system reform plan announced on November 28 last year.
Lee stated that, while agreeing on the necessity of fostering the South Korean pharmaceutical and biotech industry on a global scale to strengthen national competitiveness, the final reform plan would be finalized after collecting opposing opinions from the industry on uniform price cuts.
The Ministry intends to listen to the industry's voice and to prepare a revised proposal until the Health Insurance Policy Deliberation Committee deliberates on the reform plan on the 26th.
Since releasing the initial draft of the reform plan on November 28 last year, the Ministry has presented a revised draft to the industry on March 11 at the subcommittee.
However, the domestic pharmaceutical industry continues to criticize the process as 'closed administration,' citing the failure to specify clear generic price calculation rates, mentioning only a range of 'low-to-mid 40%,' the lack of specific timing and methods for price cuts per item, and the absence of detailed criteria and periods for preferential drug pricing.
Lee repeatedly stated that he would gather industry opinions before the committee's final decision. He emphasized that, because pharmaceutical expenditures are funded through the health insurance budget, the government views the drug pricing system considering the efficiency of public insurance premiums.
"South Korea operates the drug pricing system based on the health insurance finances funded by the mandatory premiums paid by citizens," Lee stated. "Because medical fees and drug prices for both generics and new drugs are operated through health insurance finances, we value the National Health Insurance cost, which represents public expectations."
Lee also noted that he recognizes the domestic pharmaceutical industry as a partner in South Korea's efforts to advance to one of the top five global pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical powers.
This is interpreted as a necessity for the administration to communicate and make adjustments to the aspects the industry hopes will be reflected in the reform plan.
Lee stated, "Since the Ministry of Health and Welfare also aims to leap into a top-five pharmaceutical and bio-powerhouse as a national task, the pharmaceutical industry is an important partner," Lee explained. "We are discussing the reform plan with the industry. There is a backlash because the industry has more favorable, explicit expectations, but we will continue to communicate. There is room for modification within the system."
Lee added, "There may be differing opinions because the industry has its own perspective and expected levels. While the Ministry has its position as a policy authority, we work by looking at where the public views, perspective, and interests lie."
Lee stated, "We are open to differing opinions on Ministry policy or points raised by the media. We are not setting one thing and trying to force it through," adding, "Policy can continue to change."
Lee concluded by saying, "The need to foster the pharmaceutical industry and the fact that generic prices are high are areas where there is a relatively social consensus. We have carefully considered the drug pricing policy. We are listening to the pharmaceutical industry's opinions," adding, "We fully recognize, acknowledge, and respect the necessity for innovative pharmaceutical companies and the domestic industry to possess national competitiveness and move toward becoming a bio-power. We support and share with the industry's aspiration to expand to a larger global stage."
댓글 운영방식은
댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.
댓글 노출방식은
댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.
댓글의 삭제 기준은
다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.
저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우
상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물
타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물
근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물
특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우
특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용
사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우
욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용
정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)
특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우
특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우
특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우
타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우
게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용
서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우
동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우
부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함
제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우
돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물
게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우
수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우
기타사항
각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우
기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우
기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용
사실 관계 확인 후 삭제
저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우
타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우
당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)
※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.
※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.
※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.