-
-
![]()
- by Lee, Jeong-Hwan Mar 09, 2026 08:53am
The amendment to the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, prohibiting non-face-to-face care platforms from concurrently operating as pharmaceutical wholesalers, is expected to be passed in its original form without revisions.Analysis suggests that related personnel, including Representative Choo Mi-ae, Chairperson of the Legislation and Judiciary Committee, and Representative Han Jeoung-ae, Chair of the Democratic Party's Policy Committee, have maintained a firm commitment to the original bill, which had been stalled at the plenary session for several months after being initially scheduled for processing late last year.The legislation had previously passed the Health and Welfare Committee and the Legislation and Judiciary Committee with agreement between both parties. However, it was repeatedly excluded from the plenary agenda due to opposition from certain lawmakers and the Ministry of Small Businesses and Startups.According to officials from the National Assembly and the pharmaceutical industry, the Pharmaceutical Act prohibiting non-face-to-face care platforms from concurrently operating as pharmaceutical wholesalers is likely to pass the National Assembly plenary session this month.The amendment is aimed at preventing conflicts of interest that arise when a non-face-to-face platform also acting as a wholesaler. If a platform acts as an intermediary for non-face-to-face treatment while also functioning as a wholesaler, a conflict of interest can arise. This is because the platform would be directly involved in prescribing, preparing, and distributing the medications it manages. Additionally, this setup raises concerns that the system could be misused as a method for providing rebates on illegal medications.Some Representatives characterized the bill as the "Doctor Now Prevention Act" and argued it would stifle innovation in the telemedicine sector. Accordingly, this bill was delayed for the National Assembly consideration.In this process, a sharp difference in positions between the relevant government agencies, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, emerged, leading to suggestions that mediation by the Prime Minister's Office and the Office of the President was necessary.However, Ministry of Health and Welfare Minister Jung Eun Kyeong maintained firmly on passing the original version to ensure institutional safety and block market distortions. Within the Democratic Party, voices grew to maintain the original bill, with leadership emphasizing that revised proposals should not compromise the legislative process.In fact, ruling party lawmakers, including Democratic Party Chairman Jung Cheong-rae and Rep. Choo Mi-ae, visited the General Assembly of the Korean Pharmaceutical Association and promised to pass pharmacy-related legislation, including a bill to prevent intermediary platforms from concurrently operating wholesale businesses. Consequently, it is likely that the bill will be considered and processed during this month's plenary session.An official from a Democratic Party lawmaker’s office commented, "From the start, the bill that passed the Legislation and Judiciary Committee was not a matter where amendments should have been discussed, or its tabling in the plenary session was repeatedly excluded without a specific reason." The official added, "While there were some differing opinions within the party, the floor leadership stayed committed to passing the original version."