LOGIN
ID
PW
MemberShip
2026-03-11 11:39:49
All News
Policy
Company
Product
Opinion
InterView
검색
Dailypharm Live Search
Close
Company
Expanded reimbursement for 'Lorviqua' expected soon
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Apr 17, 2025 05:57am
Product photo of Lorviqua The non-small cell lung cancer treatment 'Lorviqua' is expected to receive expanded insurance reimbursement after many attempts. According to industry sources, Pfizer Korea has recently signed an agreement with the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) regarding drug pricing negotiations for the third generation ALK cancer drug Lorviqua (lorlatinib) as a first-line treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic NSCLC. Such accomplishment took 10 months since the breakdown of the drug price negotiations in May 2024, and then Pfizer had filed for reimbursement again. Pfizer immediately filed for general listing, which passed the last Drug Reimbursement Evaluation Committee (DREC) of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) last year. Even after reapplication, the reimbursement process has been slow. Analysis suggests that the government postponed the decision because Lorviqua was initially contracted as a total expenditure-capped RSA, then switched to a general listing. Earlier in January 2024, when the process for expanded reimbursement had been in process, Pfizer had filed for general medicine reimbursement. Of note, ALK cancer drugs, including the first-generation drug 'Xalkori (crizotinib)' and the second-generation drugs 'Alecensa (alectinib)' and 'Zykadia (ceritinib),' are all general listing medications. During the negotiations, Pfizer suggested switching to a general listing during the negotiation. However, the government insisted that "negotiations for the total expenditure-capped RSA must be completed before the company can move on to the next step." As a result, the negotiations ultimately failed. Meanwhile, Lorviqua is a drug designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The drug has been assessed as having clinical significance based on the long-term follow-up results of the CROWN study, which was recently presented at the ASCO. The study results showed that Lorviqua reduced the disease progression and death risk by 81% compared to crizotinib, and 60% of treated patients were alive without disease progression even after five years. The risk of brain metastasis was reduced in 94% of the treated patients, with only 4 out of 114 patients who did not previously had brain metastasis developing it after being treated with Lorviqua.
Company
Lundbeck Korea appoints Brad Edwards as first foreign CEO
by
Whang, byung-woo
Apr 17, 2025 05:57am
Brad Edwards, new CEO of Lundbeck Korea On the 1st, Lundbeck, a global pharmaceutical company specializing in the treatment of brain diseases, announced on the 16th that it has appointed Brad Edwards as its first foreign CEO in 23 years since the establishment of its Korean subsidiary. The new CEO is a professional with extensive experience and expertise gained from 25 years of service at various multinational pharmaceutical companies, including Schering-Plough, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda. Recently, he served as the Head of Plasma Derived Therapies (Growth and Emerging Markets) at Takeda in Singapore. Since joining Shire in 2014, Edwards has gained extensive experience through Shire's extensive rare disease portfolio. He has since served as the General Manager of Takeda Australia and New Zealand. Also, as a board member of Medicines Australia, he has contributed to shaping the external policy environment in Australia to improve patients' access to treatments for rare diseases. With the appointment of the new CEO, Lundbeck expects his extensive experience and in-depth knowledge in the field of rare diseases to play a crucial role in preparing Lundbeck Korea for its expansion into the field of neuro-rare diseases. CEO Brad Edwards said, “I am honored to have the opportunity to work in Korea by joining Lundbeck and am looking forward to joining Lundbeck's ‘Focused Innovator’ strategic journey.” He added, “I will work to reinforce Lundbeck Korea's position in the field of neuroscience and drive the company's expansion into other areas where there is an unmet medical need.” He added, “I am looking forward to learning more about the Korean culture, working closely with my colleagues at Lundbeck, and, above all, contributing to the development of treatments that have a real impact on Korean patients.” Lundbeck Korea is a multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, and specializes in brain disease treatments, researching and developing treatments for neurological and psychiatric diseases. Representatively, the company owns the antidepressants Lexapro (escitalopram oxalate) and Brintellix (vortioxetine hydrobromide), Alzheimer's disease treatment Ebixa (memantine hydrochloride), and Parkinson's disease treatment Azilect (rasagiline mesylate).
Company
Vantive Korea to become kidney disease therapy leader
by
Whang, byung-woo
Apr 17, 2025 05:57am
Vantive, a spinoff of Baxter that was newly launched as an independent company, is embarking on a full-scale market penetration based on its manpower in the field of kidney treatment. In the long term, the company plans to provide solutions to become a company that provides life-sustaining organ therapy, beyond kidney treatment. Kwanghyuk Im, General Manager of Vantive Korea Vantive Korea held a meeting on the 16th to commemorate its launch in Korea and share the company's goals and strategies. Vantive was launched in February as a spin-off of Baxter's Renal Care and Acute Care Business Unit and seeks to be a company focusing on “Vital Organ Therapy.” The spin-off was made to establish a clearer business strategy by responding quickly to rapidly changing healthcare needs and focusing on innovation in each company's area of expertise. Vantive plans to present its business direction based on its legacy of leading innovation in kidney care for the past 70 years, with its mission “Extending lives, expanding possibilities.” Kwanghyuk Im, General Manager of Vantive Korea, said, “Vantive is a vital organ therapy company that aims to raise the standards of kidney and life-sustaining organ treatment,” Im added, “We will not only provide disease treatment solutions but also strive to remove obstacles in the treatment process from the beginning to the end as a companion in our patient’s treatment journey.” However, at the time of the spinoff, Vantive's business activities were not much different from those of Baxter's existing renal business unit. Some argue that the direction of a long-term plan is important for a company to differentiate itself as a standalone company. In this regard, Im said, “Baxter's business structure was diverse, so it was not easy for the company to invest in or conduct research and development (R&D) in a particular business under such circumstances. As Vantive has a major mission of long-term treatment for life support, we expect to be able to make more focused and differentiated investments." Im added, “We cannot reveal specific plans for new products, but we are soliciting various R&D ideas on a global scale to improve products and services. We fully expect there to be new innovations.” Vantive plans to provide innovative products, digital-enhanced solutions, and advanced services to support dialysis at home and in hospitals, as well as treatment options to support the kidney and vital organ functions of critically ill patients. In addition, the company aims to combine an automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) system with a digital patient management platform in the field of peritoneal dialysis to enable healthcare professionals to make patient-specific decisions quickly and accurately based on automatically transmitted data. “Vantive is working to improve the patient's treatment experience and reduce the inconvenience experienced during the treatment process,” said Im. ”We want to reduce the burden of treatment through patient-centric services such as a 24-hour consultation service for peritoneal dialysis patients and direct delivery of dialysis fluid to their homes.” In addition, Vantive plans to lead the advancement of critical care through multi-organ treatment, including continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). In the future, the company plans to pursue innovations that can be applied to the treatment of sepsis and organ failure, such as lung and liver failure. “We plan to expand our activities to raise awareness of end-stage renal disease and improve the dialysis environment, as well as sponsor the Kidney Camp for Children and other various social contribution programs,” said Im. ”We will work to provide better treatment experience at various points of contact between patients and healthcare professionals, fulfill our corporate social responsibility, and create sustainable change.”
Company
Expanded indication for Iclusig as a first-line treatment
by
Whang, byung-woo
Apr 17, 2025 05:57am
Product photo of Iclusig On the 16th, Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical (CEO Sung-ho Moon) announced that Iclusig (ingredient name: ponatinib) can now be used in combination with chemotherapy for treating adult patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL). This expanded indication has expanded Iclusig's use of scope from a third-line or higher treatment for Ph+ ALL to Ph+ ALL first-line treatment. Previously, Iclusig was approved for the treatment of adult patients with chronic, accelerated, or blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Ph+ ALL who were refractory to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as well as for the treatment of adult patients with T315I-positive chronic, accelerated, or blast phase CML or T315I-positive Ph+ ALL. This expansion of indications follows the expedited approval by the U.S. FDA in March 2024 for combining therapy comprised of Iclusig and chemotherapy to treat newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL patients. It has also led to an expansion of its indications in South Korea. Through this, Iclusig can now be used in Korea as a first-line treatment for adult Ph+ ALL patients in combination with chemotherapy for up to 20 cycles. The PhALLCON trial, which served as the basis for this approval, was a Phase 3 trial (randomized, open-label) conducted at 77 institutions across 17 countries. The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of ponatinib (brand name: Iclusig) with low-intensity chemotherapy versus the combination of the first-generation TKI imatinib (brand name Glivec) with low-intensity chemotherapy in 245 newly diagnosed adult Ph+ ALL patients. Study results showed that the primary evaluation endpoint, the MRD-negative complete remission (MRD-neg CR) rate at the end of induction therapy (12 weeks), was 34.4% in the Iclusig group, approximately twice as high as the 16.7% observed in the imatinib group. Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the Iclusig group at 20.0 months compared to 7.9 months in the imatinib group. In terms of safety, Iclusig demonstrated manageable tolerability. The treatment discontinuation rate due to adverse events was reported to be 12% (n=20/164) patients in the Iclusig group and 12% (n=10/81) in the imatinib group. The incidence of treatment-related serious adverse events was 20.9% (n=34/163) in the Iclusig group and 19.8% (n=16/81) in the imatinib group. Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical representative stated, "Iclusig demonstrated superior MRD-neg CR and stable drug tolerability compared to the conventional therapy, such as the first-generation TKI, when used as a first-line treatment for patients with Ph+ ALL," and added, "Based on this expansion of indication, Iclusig, which was used for three or more line of treatments, is available as a first-line treatment option."
Company
‘Should consider early use of effective new drugs for CML’
by
Son, Hyung Min
Apr 17, 2025 05:57am
Timothy Hughes, Professor of Hematology, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute “Although various treatment options have emerged for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), there is still unmet demand, as more than half of patients are intolerant. As CML treatment strategies are shifting to inducing a strong response in the early phase, it is important to prioritize the use of effective drugs.” Timothy Hughes, Professor of Hematology at the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, recently gave this assessment regarding CML treatment strategies during an interview with Dailypharm. The development of various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), starting with Novartis' Gleevec, a first-generation targeted anticancer drug, in 2006, then the second-generation treatment options BMS' Sprycel, Novartis' Tasigna, Pfizer’s Bosulif, Il-Yang Pharmaceutical’s Supect, and the third-generation TKI Otsuka's Iclusig, has dramatically improved survival rates. However, since the existing first- to third-generation TKIs target the ATP binding site, there is a high possibility of developing resistance to mutations, which limits long-term treatment sustainability. In addition, as treatment options are limited for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease, there is a need for effective switching strategies and new treatment options in the third-line treatment space. Unlike existing treatment options, the fourth-generation TKI Scemblix is approved and mainly used as a third-line treatment for CML in Korea due to its specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket t (STAMP) inhibition mechanism. Recently, it has been approved as a first-line treatment in Korea, the United States, and Europe, expanding its scope of use. Professor Hughes said, “We have seen a dramatic improvement in survival since the advent of TKI-based treatments, but many patients still experience treatment failure due to drug intolerance or resistance.” He added, “In particular, Scemblix is becoming an important alternative for patients who were contraindicated from using existing TKI treatment due to cardiovascular disease, etc.” Scemblix demonstrates superior efficacy in direct comparison studies with existing targeted therapies Scemblix has demonstrated its therapeutic improvement effect through a head-to-head study with existing targeted therapies. The clinical trial, ASC4FIRST, was the first study to compare Scemblix with standard first-line treatments currently available for newly diagnosed CML patients. The trial randomly assigned adult CML patients to the Scemblix group and the standard TKI treatment group and compared the major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 48. The results of the study showed that the MMR achievement rate at week 48 was 67.7% in the Scemblix-treated group and 49.0% in the standard TKI-treated group, showing an 18.9% difference. In terms of safety, the Scemblix-treated group showed a relatively low incidence of Grade 3 or higher adverse reactions, discontinuation rate due to adverse reactions, and dose adjustment and discontinuation rate for adverse reaction management compared to the control group. The biggest concern for TKI treatments, including Iclusig, which had been mainly used as a third-line therapy, was cardiovascular toxicity. Iclusig is known to have a tendency to increase the incidence of arterial occlusion depending on the dose. According to Professor Hughes, Iclusig should be used only in patients with no other treatment option because there have been many serious arterial system adverse reactions observed even at the standard dose of 45 mg per day. STAMP inhibitors have high target specificity as they act on the myristoyl pocket of the BCR-ABL1 protein, not the ATP binding site. Through this differentiated mechanism of action, Scemblix offers the advantage of maintaining a strong therapeutic effect while minimizing side effects. Professor Hughes commented, “Through the ASC4FIRST trial, Scemblix has demonstrated both efficacy and safety profiles superior to those of Gleevec, Tasigna, and Sprycel, which are currently used as first-line treatments for CML.” He went on to say, “In particular, Scemblix showed a higher MMR compared to Gleevec and also showed excellent results in terms of safety. The treatment discontinuation rate due to toxicity was also only half that of Gleevec. In addition, Scemblix also demonstrated higher treatment response rates and safety in the patient group compared to second-generation TKIs.” Potential rises for Scemblix as a first-line treatment option... “One step closer to treatment-free remission” #EB Professor Hughes believes that while CML treatment strategies have focused on improving survival in the past, it is now important to enable patients to achieve treatment-free remission and enjoy a 'life without need for treatment.' According to Professor Hughes, recent CML treatments tend to focus on inducing a strong response early, in the first-line treatment phase. This is because a fast and strong response induced by intensive treatment from the beginning can lead to a positive prognosis in the long term and ultimately increase the likelihood of achieving a treatment-free remission. Professor Hughes said, “Another notable agenda is that the treatment goal of patients is shifting to treatment-free remission. In fact, when patients are asked what treatment goal they most desire, most of them want to ‘no longer take medication.’ To date, the proportion of patients who have reached treatment-free remission is about 30%, but we expect that the figure will rise to more than 50% in the future through the use of STAMP inhibitors.” Professor Hughes believes that Scemblix has a high potential for use as a first-line treatment for CML. The ASCEND study, led by Professor Hughes, was the first Scemblix monotherapy clinical trial, involving approximately 100 patients. Professor Hughes explained that the results of the study were similar to those of the pivotal Scemblix clinical trial. “In Australia, ASCEND is currently undergoing a follow-up clinical trial. Patients who meet the criteria for participation are mostly enrolled in the study and receiving Scemblix as a first-line treatment,” added Professor Hughes. “For patients who are unable to participate in the trial, we are treating them with the best available option.” He went on to say, “Currently, the most important goal of first-line treatment is for patients to achieve a deep molecular response early and ultimately achieve a treatment-free remission. However, for patients who need to receive third line of treatment, the treatment goals will inevitably vary depending on the course and situation.” He said, “Scemblix has shown high safety and efficacy from the early stages of clinical trials. It is a drug that has shown the potential to be used not only as third-line treatment but also as first-line treatment.” He also emphasized, “We expect a strong therapeutic effect when Scemblix is used as a first-line treatment. If there were no restrictions set in our clinical trials, more than 90% of the patients may use Scemblix as a first-line treatment.”
Company
Vyndamax may be prescribed at tertiary hospitals in KOR
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Apr 16, 2025 05:55am
Vyndamax, which was finally granted insurance reimbursement after 5 attempts, may now be prescribed in general hospitals. According to industry sources, Pfizer Korea's treatment for ATTR-CM (Tafamidis 61mg) passed the drug committees of 26 medical institutions nationwide, including the ‘Big 5’ major hospitals (Samsung Medical Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, and Severance Hospital). Vyndamax was approved in Korea in August 2020 and has been granted reimbursement since March this year after a series of twists and turns. It failed its first reimbursement challenge in early 2021, Vyndamax failed to be designated as an essential drug at the time. In the first half of the same year, the company evaluated the drug’s cost-effectiveness and took on the second challenge through the risk-sharing agreement (RSA) track, just to meet the same results. In April 2022, it again failed to pass the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service's Reimbursement Standard Subcommittee, but in July of the same year, it passed the subcommittee but was later judged non-reimbursable by the Drug Reimbursement Evaluation Committee 9 months later. At the time, the government and the pharmaceutical company were unable to reach an agreement on the risk-sharing plan. Pfizer again submitted a reimbursement application in June last year, passed the DREC review in October of the same year, and concluded a drug price negotiation with the National Health Insurance Service last month. The maximum insurance price ceiling for Vyndamax was set at KRW 100,000. Vyndamax is a separately licensed product that contains a different dose of the same ingredient as Vyndaqel, a treatment for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Some view this as a strategy adopted by the pharmaceutical company to differentiate the drug price. However, it is encouraging that the drug was approved after 5 attempts over four years. Now, patients will only have to pay 10% of the drug price if the special calculation system is applied. The efficacy of Vyndamax was demonstrated through the Phase III ATTR-ACT study, where the drug reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with CM and showed an improvement in the six-minute walk test. In the ATTR-ACT study, 441 patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to receive 80 mg of tafamidis, 20 mg of tafamidis, and placebo, respectively, and the primary endpoints of the study were hierarchical evaluation of all-cause mortality and frequency of cardiovascular-related hospitalization. The key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline to month 30 for the 6-minute walk test and the score on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS), in which higher scores indicate better health status. Study results showed that tafamidis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality and frequency of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations compared to placebo.
Company
Tepmetko targets rare lung cancer target with reimbursement
by
Whang, byung-woo
Apr 16, 2025 05:55am
Merck is seeking to increase the market influence of Tepmetko (tepotinib), which was granted reimbursement 3 years after its approval, by improving treatment access. Although the MET mutation is a rare mutation that occurs in 1.8-3.1% of non-small cell lung cancer patients in Korea, it is evaluated that the drug’s reimbursement will have a significant effect as it increases the success rate when early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are carried out. Ji-Youn Han, professor of Hemato-Oncology at the National Cancer Center, On the 15th, Merck Biopharma Korea held a press conference to shed light on the implications brought by Tepmetko’s reimbursement, a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 deletion mutation. In Korea, MET mutations in non-small cell lung cancer are known to cause resistance to other anticancer treatments and have a high rate of metastasis to bones, the brain, etc., which is associated with poor patient prognosis. In addition, most patients are elderly, which lowers the response rate to immuno-oncology drugs, and most patients relapse within 5 months. “MET-mutated non-small cell lung cancer has a poor prognosis, and brings threefold increased risk of death compared to those without mutations,” said Ji-Youn Han, a professor of Hemato-Oncology at the National Cancer Center, who presented at the press conference. ”Most patients are elderly, have a low response rate to immuno-oncology drugs, and have difficulty tolerating strong side effects, so there was a high unmet need for MET-mutation targeted therapies.” Tepmetko’s reimbursement was based on the Phase II VISION study in patients with MET-mutated NSCLC. In the 32.6-month follow-up of 313 patients diagnosed by liquid biopsy or tissue biopsy, Tepmetko showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 58.6%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15.9 months, median overall survival (OS) of 29.7 months, and median duration of response (DoR) of 46.4 months in patients diagnosed by tissue biopsy and with no previous treatment experience. These results were consistent regardless of treatment line, biopsy method, etc., and showed consistent efficacy in Asian patients, including Koreans. In a subgroup analysis of 106 Asian patients, the ORR of patients who were initially treated with Tepmetko was 64%, with a median PFS of 16.5 months, a median OS of 32.7 months, and a median DoR of 20.7. “The importance of personalized treatment based on MET mutations is being emphasized in the non-small cell lung cancer setting. Tepmetko has demonstrated consistent effects regardless of the treatment line in Asians,” said Professor Han. Although Tepmetko has demonstrated its effect through clinical results, the company had to jump over high hurdles to be included in the reimbursement list. After failing to set the reimbursement criteria twice, including during the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service's Cancer Disease Review Committee meeting, the company voluntarily withdrew its reimbursement application, and submitted a new application in July last year, which led to the current result. As a result, Tepmetko became the first treatment option in the same class to be listed for reimbursement, ahead of Tabrecta (capmatinib), an anticancer drug that was approved in Korea at the same time in 2021. Currently, Tepmetko is expected to quickly settle into the prescription environment as it has passed the Drug Committees (DCs) of more than 30 medical institutions nationwide, including the Big 5 tertiary hospitals such as Samsung Medical Center and Seoul National University Hospital. “From the perspective of a doctor treating patients in the clinical setting, we need more treatment options to keep patients alive and improve their quality of life,” said Professor Han. ”I think this coverage of Tepmetko is a positive step because it means patients can use it without financial burden.” “We hope that this reimbursement of Tepmetko will play an important role in the future treatment environment in Korea,” said Christoph Hamann, General Manager of Merck BioPharma Korea. ”Merck will continue to endeavor to drive innovation at the forefront in the field of cancer treatment and will continue to strive to improve the intractable cancer treatment environment.”
Company
Orphan drug 'Thio Spal-P' avoids approval cancellation
by
Kim, Jin-Gu
Apr 15, 2025 05:55am
A rare disease treatment, 'Thio Spal-P Inj (thiotepa),' faced narrow escape from receiving approval cancellation. According to pharmaceutical industry sources on the 11th, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Dongin Pharm against the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), ruling a 'plaintiff victory' on the 10th. Dongin Pharm filed a suit in the administrative court arguing that the MFDS' administrative measure related to the cancelation of imported item approval in May last year. This rare disease treatment is used as a premedication regimen before autologous·allogenic stem cell transplantation in adult·pediatric patients with hematological diseases. It is also used when high-dose chemotherapy in combination with stem cell transplantation is adequate for treating adults·pediatric patients with solid cancers. This type of drug, with imported annual sales below KRW 200 million, faced several hurdles. Initially, a medical device company imported a product called 'Thiotepa,' manufactured by US-based pharma company Bedford and distributed in South Korea. However, concerns have been raised in the United States that environmental waste and carcinogens are hugely produced during the production of Thiotepa. Therefore, the US-based manufacturer discontinued production of this drug, leading to discontinued import by the Korean importing company. After that, the Korea Orphan Drug & Essential Drug Center responded. The Korea Orphan Drug & Essential Drug Center secured 'Tepadina Inj' from Italia and began distributing in South Korea. Then, Korean companies also began importing this drug. Dongin Pharm received approval for the imported product 'Tepadina Inj 15mg·1g' with the same active ingredient. This drug soon became included in the National Health Insurance reimbursement list. On May 21st, the MFDS issued an administrative measure of cancellation of imported product approval for this drug. The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) announced that the reimbursement of this drug will be discontinued the next day due to the decision of approval cancellation by the MFDS. The announcement to suspend reimbursement was reversed within a day. On that same day, the MOHW announced that the reimbursement status for this drug would be maintained. The decision was made in response to a notification from the administrative court indicating that a suspension of execution had been filed. It was due to Dongin Pharm filing a suspension of execution and an administrative suit. In response to MFDS giving a cancelation measure of imported product approval, Dongin Pharm immediately filed a suit for withdrawing such measure and applied for suspension of execution until the ruling. The court accepted the application for suspension of execution. The lawsuit lasted over a year. Dongin Pharm and MFDS appeared in court three times since September 2024 to argue whether cancellation measure of the imported product is appropriate. Ultimately, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Donging Pharm. Therefore, Dongin Pharm, which imports Thio Spal-P, was relieved. However, the MFDS has yet to decide whether to appeal. In South Korea, three companies have received approval for imported rare disease treatments containing thiotepa. Two pharmaceutical companies are distributing these drugs to South Korea, excluding a company without any import record. However, Thio Spal-P is the only drug that is in injectable formulation.
Company
Daehwa Pharmaceutical's Liporaxel aims for listing in China
by
Nho, Byung Chul
Apr 15, 2025 05:55am
The world's first oral paclitaxel, Liporaxel, for gastric cancer, is expected to enter the first negotiation step with the Chinese health authority in June for health insurance listing. The negotiation outcome gains attention. Daehwa Pharmaceutical's Liporaxel is sold in local Chinese hospitals at approximately KRW 940,000 per 30 mg. Sources said that this drug's anticipated reimbursement price will likely range KRW 400,000-450,000. The global market for paclitaxel injectables is valued at roughly KRW 5 trillion, of which China accounts for approximately 40–50%, making it a critical battleground for drug launches. Liporaxel obtained marketing approval in September 2024 from the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for the indication of gastric cancer and began a full-scale launch centered in Shanghai around March. Until the development of Liporaxel solution in 2016, paclitaxel formulations had been prescribed only in injectable form. The oral liquid formulation of Liporaxel, a gastric cancer treatment, secured the status of the world's first improved drug converted from an injectable to a liquid formulation, and if reimbursement is achieved in China, its ease of administration is expected to drive rapid growth. Conventional paclitaxel intravenous (IV) treatments typically require more than three hours of infusion time, including pre-treatment, so launching a formulation-changed product has been a long-awaited goal for academia and patient groups. The mechanism of action of Daehwa Pharmaceutical Furthermore, in clinical trials for gastric cancer, the new formulation showed improved outcomes compared to IV therapy, particularly in terms of side effects such as hair loss and peripheral neuropathy, which is expected to enhance patient convenience and safety greatly. Notably, by reducing the treatment time, this drug is expected to provide more patients with the opportunity to receive treatment, thereby improving the overall efficiency of cancer care. Liporaxel demonstrated equivalent safety and efficacy compared to a control drug in a Phase 3 trial conducted in approximately 550 gastric cancer patients in China. Meanwhile, Liporaxel was licensed in September 2017 to China's RMX Biopharma under a contract that included a licensing fee of USD 25 million (approximately KRW 33.2 billion) along with separate sales royalties, and the rights for Liporaxel as a second-line treatment for advanced, metastatic, or locally recurrent gastric cancer in the markets of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Thailand are held by Haihe Biopharma.
Company
BD experts in demand due to increasing global partnerships
by
Whang, byung-woo
Apr 15, 2025 05:54am
Due to increasing technology transfer and partnership opportunities in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, the role of business development (BD) is becoming increasingly important. Also, demand is growing for the ability to move beyond R&D that advances science-based technologies to securing actual deals. BD is a position that identifies and introduces promising technologies or new products based on domestic and international market analysis and creates business opportunities such as technology transfer, strategic alliances, and joint research. This means that it is a key department that brings in new products or drives partnerships that will drive company growth, and it is directly tied to the export (licensing out) of new technologies. Domestic pharmaceutical and bio companies are achieving success and making licensing out deals overseas, thanks to increased investment in new drug development. In fact, in 2019, there were 14 licensing-out deals (worth about KRW 8.5 trillion) in Korea, and in 2021, the number of contracts reached 31, a threefold increase from the previous year, setting a new record. In particular, large-scale licensing deals are emerging, whose upfront payments exceed KRW 1 trillion per technology, although their milestone achievement progress remains to be seen. As pharmaceutical companies, which used to focus on the domestic market, are entering the global stage, the BD department is becoming at the forefront of business development, transferring technology to overseas partners and leading joint development, which is adding strength to the growing view that BD capabilities directly affect corporate competitiveness. In fact, domestic bio companies are strengthening their strategy of developing their own products from the non-clinical to early clinical stages and then licensing them out. Specifically, they are actively pursuing entry into the global market by establishing overseas subsidiaries and hiring local BD personnel. " “Lack of experience is the biggest challenge” ... Systematic training is essential. The problem is that domestic companies are still facing difficulties in the global BD process, due to the lack of negotiating power, lack of experience in evaluating technology value, and lack of global communication experience. A representative of Pharma Ventures, who the reporter met at the 2025 Young BD Workshop hosted by the Korea Drug Development Fund (KDDF), expressed disappointment in the “storytelling” poser of Korean companies. “Korean companies have very good scientific capabilities and technology, but they often fail to develop their assets to the level required by global big pharma,” said a Pharmaventures official. ”Companies often concentrate on a single pipeline, so when if they license out their technology, the company's is virtually just giving out their whole value.” It is also important to reduce the gap between investors and Korean companies when it comes to technology transfer and deal-making, but it is often assessed that Korean companies cannot translate science into 'value and business opportunities'. Ultimately, for Korean companies to find opportunities overseas, in addition to R&D, there is a growing need to develop specialized personnel who can turn these into commercial opportunities. In the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry, there is a common view that, as the saying goes, “it's all about people,” and that talent investment is important for new drug development. However, there is also a realistic point of view that there are still not enough educational opportunities to systematically train BD talents. In particular, young BD managers with 1-5 years of experience are in very high demand for training to strengthen their expertise, as they work in an environment where it is difficult to gain practical experience. In this situation, the 2025 Young BD Workshop held by KDDF in early April sought to foster the next generation of BD talent. Young-min Park, head of the National New Drug Development Project Team This event is a successor to the BD talent development workshop that began in 2018 through the pan-ministerial new drug development project and is a program that focuses on young BD practitioners in their first to fifth years to develop practical global technology transfer capacity. Young-min Park, head of the National New Drug Development Project Team, said, “A sophisticated commercialization strategy is needed from the early stages for successful new drug development. I hope this workshop will serve as a stepping stone for fostering young BD talents with expertise and practical capabilities that meet global standards.” With KDDF at the forefront, BD is responsible for the company's future growth engines, such as closing new product licensing agreements and building partnerships in the long term. As such, the company is showing a consensus on securing and cultivating talent. An industry official added, “I think the cultivation of BD talent is an important factor that can turn Korea's quality technology into commercial success. I think that the education and efforts related to BD, along with the cultivation of various talents in the pharmaceutical and bio sector, will play a major role in creating a Korean bio ecosystem in the future.”
<
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
>