LOGIN
ID
PW
MemberShip
2026-03-16 17:39:05
All News
Policy
Company
Product
Opinion
InterView
검색
Dailypharm Live Search
Close
Company
Attention focused on whether Luxturna will be reimb in Korea
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Nov 22, 2022 06:04am
Discussions on expanding coverage of the one-shot gene therapy ‘Luxturna’ is not making much progress. Therefore, the industry’s eyes are on whether Novartis Korea’s Inherited Retinal Dystrophy (IRD) treatment Luxturna (voretigene neparvovec) will be presented as an agenda for deliberation by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service’s Drug Reimbursement Evaluation Committee within this year. Novartis Korea applied for reimbursement of the drug in September last year, but no news has been heard on its passage of the Drug Reimbursement Standard Subcommittee until now. However, based on the speed of progress, the drug can still be listed in the first half of next year at the earliest. By replacing the defective or defective RPE65 gene - one of the causes of IRD - with a normal gene, Luxturna restores the visual function of an IRD patient with a single administration. In other words, the drug provides a fundamental cure for IRD. After being granted a Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA in 2014, the drug was approved as an orphan drug in 2016, then granted priority review and a fast-track designation in 2017. IRD is a rare disease in which vision loss occurs due to mutations in genes responsible for the structure and function of retinal photoreceptors. In addition to over 20 ophthalmologic diseases, IRD leads to vision loss and may cause complete blindness in certain patients. There are currently over 300 genes that have been identified as being associated with IRD. IRD, which is caused by the mutation in RPE65 gene, causes abnormalities in the visual cycle of the retina that converts visual information into a neural signal and delivers it to the brain. The mutation in the RPE65 gene reduces the RPE65 protein essential to the visual cycle and destroys the retinal cell, gradually narrowing the field of vision to eventually result in blindness. Meanwhile, the efficacy of Luxturna was established in a Phase III trial that was conducted on IRD patients with confirmed biallelic RPE65 mutations. Study results showed that the group of patients that received Luxturna demonstrated statistically significant improvements in their functional vision compared to the control group at one year of treatment. Using the mean score of the multi-luminance mobility test (MLMT), which evaluates the ability to complete the obstacle course at low light levels by recreating the daily walking environment, as the primary endpoint at one year of treatment, the MLMT score change in the Luxturna treatment group was 1.8 points, which was 1.6 points higher than the 0.2 points in the control group.
Company
GSK Duodart can be prescribed at general hospitals
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Nov 22, 2022 06:04am
Duodart, a prostate hypertrophy compound, has settled in general hospitals. According to related industries, GSK Korea's Duodart recently passed DC of Big 5 General Hospitals such as Samsung Medical Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Asan Medical Center, and Sinchon Severance Hospital. This drug has been applied to insurance benefits since March. Duodart's benefit target is ▲ an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8 or more when administered to positive prostate hypertrophy, ▲ when the size of the prostate is 30ml or higher, the occupational balance test shows moderate or higher benign prostatic hypertrophy, or the Prostate specific antigen (PSA) level meets two conditions: 1.4ng/ml or higher. Duodart is the first combination of Dutasteride and Tamsulosin introduced as a treatment for prostate hypertrophy in Korea and can be used as an oral administration of one capsule once a day to treat symptoms. It was approved by the EU and the U.S. FDA in 2010 and was approved in Korea in May last year. Combination therapy of 5α-reducing urea inhibitor (Dutasteride) and α1a-adrenaline receptor blocker (Tamsulosin HCl) is recommended in global guidelines. The complementary mechanism of two components can be expected to improve symptoms quickly and control the progression of long-term diseases. Duodart showed statistically significantly higher compliance than conventional 5α-reducing factor inhibitors and α1a-adrenergic receptor blockers Free combination through real-world data. The European Association of Urology recommends introducing 5-ARI and α blocker combination therapy from the beginning as an appropriate and effective treatment for prostate hypertrophy patients with severe or moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with increased risk of disease progression. The AUA also recommends the introduction of combination therapy from the beginning to treat prostate hypertrophy. Duodart demonstrated efficacy and safety through a licensed clinical combAT study evaluated against Dutasteride or Tamsulosin monotherapy. In the third month of treatment, the Duodart administration group showed a rapid improvement in symptoms similar to that of the monotherapy administration group, and from 9 months, superior symptom improvement was confirmed, and the effect was maintained until 48 months. In addition, Duodart's combination therapy was 12.6% (17.8% Dutasteride monotherapy and 21.5% Tamsulosin monotherapy) and 4.2% (5.2% Dutasteride monotherapy and 11.8% Tamsulosin monotherapy) in the progression of symptoms of prostate hypertrophy. Chung Chang-wook, a professor of urology at Seoul National University Hospital, said, "With the introduction of Duodart, among prostate hypertrophy patients currently being treated, those who had difficulty suppressing disease progression and improving symptoms with existing drug therapy can choose a new treatment."
Company
Evrysdi can be prescribed with non-reimbursement
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Nov 21, 2022 05:56am
Evrysdi, an eating spinal muscular atrophy treatment, can be prescribed at hospitals and is still non-reimbursement. According to related industries, Roche Korea's Spinal Muscular Atrophy treatment passed through D.C. at medical institutions such as Severance Hospital, Seoul National University Hospital, Yangsan Pusan National University Hospital, and Yongin Severance Hospital. Evrysdi, which was approved in Korea in November 2020, was first approved for "adult and infant SMA patients for more than 2 months." On top of that, the U.S. recently expanded the scope of administration to infants under 2 months of age in the United States. Evrysdi, the first oral option as an SMA treatment, has the advantage of being able to be customized according to age and weight. The process of registering insurance benefits is still sluggish. Solidarity Against Disability Discrimination issued a statement last month when Zolgensma's benefit was applied, calling on the HIRA to abolish the criteria for suspension of Spinraza's benefit, the same SMA treatment, and implementation of Evrysdi discussions as soon as possible. Evrysdi points out that SMA patients are emerging in the blind spot of therapy as the Korea Appraisal Board continues to withhold discussions on benefits just because they will discuss them in the future in line with the adjustment of Spinraza's application standards. Currently, the SMA area lists Biogen's Spinraza and Novartis' Zolgensma. Evrysdi proved its efficacy through a FIREFISH study conducted on infants of 2 months to 7 months and a SUNFISH study conducted on children and adults aged 2 to 25. In SUNFISH conducted in 180 SMA type 2 or type 3 patients, Evrysdi demonstrated improvement in motor function at 12 months when measured with MFM-32, an exercise function evaluation measure. In addition, in FIREFISH conducted on infant SMA patients with type 1 2 to 7 months of age, 88% of patients who received Evrysdi for 2 years continued to survive without a ventilator for 2 years. During the two-year period, 59% of infants could sit unaided for at least 5 seconds on a BSID-III basis, which measures total infant and infant development exercise. In addition, 65 percent of infants were able to hold their throats for a year, 29 percent were able to turn themselves over for a year, and 30 percent were able to stand using support.
Company
Dong-AST ended the clinical trial of Stelara biosimilar
by
Chon, Seung-Hyun
Nov 21, 2022 05:56am
A panoramic view of Dong-A ST headquartersDong-AST announced on the 17th that the global phase 3 clinical trial of Stella biosimilar DMB-3115 has ended. Phase 3 of global clinical trials of DMB-3115 was conducted for 52 weeks in a total of 605 patients in 9 countries, including Poland, Estonia, and Latvia, starting in the United States in 2021. Phase 3 of this global clinical trial was conducted with random assignment, double-blinding, multi-organ, and active-controlled trials to compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of DMB-3115 and Stelara subcutaneous injection in moderate to severe chronic plate psoriasis patients. Clinical samples produced by STGEN BIO, a biopharmaceutical CDMO affiliate of Dong-A Socio Holdings, were used. Dong-AST plans to apply for DMB-3115 item permits in the U.S. and Europe in the first half of 2023 when positive data are derived by analyzing the results of phase 3 global clinical trials. Stelara, developed by Janssen, is a treatment for inflammatory diseases such as plate psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. It is a blockbuster product that recorded sales of 9.134 billion dollars (about 11.64 trillion won) last year. Since 2013, Dong-A Socio Holdings has promoted the joint development of the DMB-3115 with Meiji Seika Pharma. In July 2020, Dong-AST took over the right to develop and commercialize the global development project with the aim of promoting the efficiency of the global development project and jointly developed it with Meiji Seika Pharma. In 2019, phase 1 European clinical trials comparing the pharmacokinetic properties of DMB-3115 and Stelara in healthy adults demonstrated pharmacokinetic similarities between DMB-3115 and Stelara. Dong-AST signed a technology export contract for DMB-3115 with multinational pharmaceutical company Intas Pharmaceuticals in July last year. Intas Pharmaceuticals has secured exclusive rights to licenses and sales in global regions except for Korea, Japan, and some Asian countries. Global commercialization will be handled by Accord Healthcare, a subsidiary of Intas Pharmaceuticals. Dong-AST and Meiji Seika Pharma are responsible for the research and development of DMB-3115 and for the exclusive supply of products to Intas and Accord Healthcare.
Company
KPBMA visits Boston...expands exchanges with MIT, etc.
by
Chon, Seung-Hyun
Nov 18, 2022 06:04am
On the 14th (local time) KPBMA Director Hee-Mok Won (8th from the left), Huons Vice Chairman Sung-Tae Yoon (9th from the left), MIT Corporate Relations Executive Director John Roberts is taking a commemorative photograph at the EB that was held at MIT ILP Office at Boston, Cambridge, US On the 17th, Korea Pharmaceutical and Bio-Pharma Manufacturers Association (KPBMA) announced that its delegation had visited Boston, US to network with local companies and institutions. Hee-Mok Won, Director of KPBMA, Sung-Tae Yoon, Chairman of KPBMA, and other representatives of Korea’s pharmaceutical and bio business attended the executive briefing (EB) prepared through MIT Industrial Liaison Program (ILP) especially for Korean companies for 4 days from the 14th. In June 2020, KPBMA became the first association to join the consortium-type membership in the history of MIT ILP. The EB held this time was the first face-to-face event since the KPBMA became a member, and was held to directly communicate with MIT’s innovation ecosystem. At the event, member companies in the consortium discussed research technologies face-to-face with MIT's top professors in the field of their interest, such as oncology and new drug development. Also at the event, Professor Connor W. Coley from MIT presented on the development of AI-based organic compound synthesis. Also, Professor Arturo Vegas from Boston University and Sean Quinnell presented pm a small molecule inhibitor to the cytokine interleukin-4 related to inflammation and cancer. Then, presentations from MIT spin-off companies followed, including presentations on ▲Small molecule new drug development platform (Deepcure), ▲Innovative treatment methods for resting cancer cells (Felicitex Therapeutics), ▲ Effective drug delivery technology using high molecule dissociation oral administration (Veramorph), ▲Groundbreaking blood clotting diagnostics platform (Coagulo Medical Technologies). Heads and Business Development and R&D executives from Korean pharmaceutical and bio companies including Samjin Pharm, Yuhan Corp, Ildong Pharmaceutical Hanmi Pharmaceutical, and Huons sought partnership opportunities with startups that own advanced biotechnology in addition to MIT’s various academic achievements. After the event, the delegation visited Ginkgo Bioworks, a world-class biofoundry company, to discuss ways to cooperate with domestic companies. Ginko Bioworks, a bioventure that spun off from MIT in 2008, owns its own cell programming platform and provides services that meet the needs of customers in various industries. KPBMA Director Hee-Mok Won said, “In only three years since Korean pharmaceutical companies entered the Cambridge Innovation Center (CIC) and began industry-academia cooperation with MIT in earnest, more than 15 companies have entered the market. We will expand cooperation with Boston’s innovative ecosystem including MIT and new startups to bring practical results.”
Company
Generic companies won 9 out of 10 patent disputes
by
Kim, Jin-Gu
Nov 17, 2022 05:54am
In a patent dispute between the original company and the generic company over generic for exclusivity, a study found that the generic company's first trial winning rate reached 88.5%. Lee Myung-hee, a senior researcher at the KIIP, announced the results of the impact assessment of the licensing patent-linked system at the 2022 Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Policy Forum co-hosted by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and the Korea Intellectual Property Protection Agency on the 15th. According to the researcher, a total of 1,087 patent trials have been filed over the nine years since 2013 until the end of last year. Generic companies have a winning rate of 88.5%. Generic companies claim the patent held by the original company in three ways. They include a passive judgment for confirming the scope of rights, a judgment for invalidation, and a judgment for invalidation of the extension of the duration. Among them, the passive judgment on the scope of rights has the highest winning rate for Generic companies. Since 2013, 795 passive rights scope confirmation trials have been filed, of which 767 (96.5%) have been cited. Some citations include 19 cases (2.4%), 8 cases (1.0%), and 1 case of withdrawal. If Generic companies request a passive judgment on the scope of rights, 98.9% of them were cited or partially used. In the case of invalidation trials, the winning rate of General Motors is a little low at 78.9%. A total of 218 invalidation trials were filed over the nine years from 2013 to last year, of which 161 (73.9%) were cited and 13 (6.0%) were partially cited. The winning rate of generic companies, which combines citation and partial citation, is 79.8%. The Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal's rejection (24 cases), partial dismissal (13 cases), and withdrawal (7 cases) were 20.2%. In other words, if General Electric filed for invalidation judgment, the original company succeeded in one out of five cases. Generics have not won the trial that was filed to invalidate some of the extended patent duration. There were a total of 74 trials for invalidation of the extension of the patent duration from 2013 to last year. Among them, only two cases (2.7%) were cited. There were 68 cases of rejection (91.9%), and 4 cases of withdrawal (5.4%). This means that most of the original companies won the dispute over the extended patent duration. Lee Myung-hee, a senior researcher, said, "The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety's approval rate for generic exclusivity sales items is 79.2%, which can be interpreted as meaning that generics are taking on patent challenges with considerable grounds."
Company
Announcement of commercialization of oral insulin
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Nov 17, 2022 05:54am
Expectations are rising for PO use for injectable insulin. Medicox recently signed an exclusive distribution contract with Israeli pharmaceutical company Oramed Pharmaceuticals following the introduction of oral insulin technology. As a result, Medicox will be able to distribute Oramed's oral insulin candidate "ORMD-0801" for 10 years in Korea after approval by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Oramed is said to be innovating the diabetes treatment market through the development of ORMD-0801, which is undergoing phase 3. Topline results of Phase 3 will be released in January 2023, and ORMD-0801 is expected to be the world's first commercial oral insulin capsule for diabetes treatment in the future. SCD Pharmaceutical, a domestic pharmaceutical company, is also developing oral insulin. The company is currently preparing an IND application for oral insulin SCD-0503. This clinical review period takes at least six months, but the clinical review period can be shortened through the submission of data from previous studies. It will be possible to consult with the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in major countries to simplify the clinical trial period and conditions. In addition, based on the results of previous studies, it is possible to advantageously adjust the contract terms with partners. SCD conducted prior research for the purpose of final verification of global clinical, registration, and commercialization at the request of partners in the United States, Europe, China, and Japan. The company explained that SCD-0503 showed faster drug expression time and higher absorption rate than Israel Oramed at Human Pilot Study. Insulin PO is delivered to the liver through the intestinal absorption process. It is evaluated that insulin can prevent hypoglycemia and help control weight with a principle similar to that of going from the pancreas to the liver.
Company
The aftermath of stricter generic regulations?
by
Kim, Jin-Gu
Nov 16, 2022 06:11am
It was found that the number of applications for generic for exclusivity decreased sharply. Experts agree that the implementation of the 1+3 system has affected the decrease in the number of generic for exclusivity applications. Lee Myung-hee, a senior researcher at KIIP, introduced the number of generic for exclusivity applications in 2020 and 2021 at the 2022 Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Policy Forum held on the 15th. According to him, the number of generic for exclusivity, which reached 272 in 2020, plunged to 26 in 2021. The implementation of the 1+3 system is likely to be the reason for the sharp drop in the number of applications for generic for exclusivity. Lee Myung-hee said, "The 1+3 system has been in effect since July 2021. The number of generic for exclusivity applications has decreased significantly compared to the previous year, he said. "We need to accumulate more data to see if it is the result of the implementation of the system, but we believe that the implementation of the system has affected the decline in a number of generic for exclusion applications." Until now, the pharmaceutical industry has consistently pointed out that the effectiveness of the system is poor due to the acquisition of generic for exclusivity. It was criticized that it did not fit the purpose of introducing the system to induce patent challenges by granting exclusive sales rights. In the case of Jardiance Duo, 99 generics obtained generic for exclusivity. 45 generics for Amosartan, and 33 generics for Janumet won generics. Lawyer Lee & Ko, an example, pointed out, "As many generics acquire generic for exclusivity at the same time, pharmaceutical companies have repeatedly challenged patents due to economic losses due to non-acquisition rather than economic benefits from acquiring generic for exclusivity." A lawyer said, "Since the 1+3 system was implemented in July 2021, BA test data have not been available indefinitely," adding, "As a result, the number of applications for generic for exclusivity seems to have decreased sharply. "In 2022, the acquisition of generic for exclusivity is expected to decrease further," he said. "However, as the effectiveness of the generic for exclusivity increases, it is necessary to examine whether the 1+3 system hinders generic development or hinders generic companies' patent challenges," a lawyer stressed. Attorney Kim Ji-hee said, "A close analysis is needed to see if the implementation of the 1+3 system has actually affected the reduction of generic for exclusivity."
Company
Gavreto applies for reimbursement following Retevmo
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Nov 16, 2022 06:10am
In line with the progress made in Retevmo’s reimbursement review process, its competitor Gavreto was also found to have started its reimbursement process in Korea. According to industry sources, Roche Korea submitted an application for the reimbursement of its RET (Rearranged during transfection) gene fusion targeted therapy Gavreto (pralsetinib). With the reimbursement agenda for Lilly Korea’s Retevmo (selpercatinib) passing the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service’s Cancer Disease Deliberation Committee (CDDC) meeting earlier this month, the industry’s eyes are on the reimbursement progress of the two drugs. At the meeting, the CDDC set reimbursement standards for Retevmo as a treatment for patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, thyroid cancer who require systemic therapy with prior sorafenib and/or lenvatinib treatment history, etc. Although Gavreto was slightly behind in applying for reimbursement, as both are advanced new drugs that target a very small number of patients, there lies the possibility that the government will discuss the reimbursement listing of the two drugs together. The two RET-targeted anticancer drugs may also benefit from HIRA’s plan to reduce the reimbursement listing period of drugs by 30 days used for life-threatening diseases, depending on the specific timing of its implementation. Meanwhile, Retevmo and Gavreto were both granted marketing authorization by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in March this year. As the two drugs not only inhibit primary RET fusions and mutations but also secondary RET mutations that cause resistance to anticancer treatment, the drugs are expected to address the unmet needs that remain in various types of cancers. In terms of the approval period, Retevmo became the first to receive global approval by a few months. Retevmo received marketing authorization from the US FDA in May last year, and Gavreto in September. Retevmo was approved for NSCLC and thyroid cancer indications, whereas Gavreto was first approved as a lung cancer treatment and then approved for thyroid cancer in December of the same year.
Company
Impinzi's indication of biliary tract cancer
by
Nov 16, 2022 06:10am
AstraZeneca Korea announced on the 14th that its immune anticancer drug "Imfinzi" has received additional approval from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety for biliary tract cancer. Imfinzi can be used as a combination therapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in the primary treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. It is the first indication of the first treatment of biliary tract cancer. The approval of this additional indication was based on a phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study that evaluated the effectiveness of lymphoid combination therapy compared to existing chemotherapy (Gemcitabine and Cisplatin) in 685 patients with local progressive or metastatic biliary tract cancer who have no treatment experience and cannot be resected through surgery. The first evaluation variable is the overall survival rate (OS), and the second evaluation variable is the progression-free survival rate (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), the response duration (DoR), and the patient report results. As a result of the study, Imfinzi group improved the overall survival rate by 20% compared to the placebo group. At the time of two years, the survival rate of the impingement group was 24.9%, and the placebo group was 10.4%. The median PFS value was 7.2 months for Impinzi, which was 25% better than 5.7 months for the placebo group. The ORR of Imfinzi group was 26.7% (91 cases), of which 2.1% (7 cases) was confirmed to be complete, and partial reactions were observed in 24.6% (84 cases). The most common abnormalities were anemia (48.2%), zone (40.22%), constipation (32%), and neutrophil reduction (31.7%), and the Impinzi group (75.7%) and the placebo group (77.8%) were similar. In a recently confirmed additional analysis, Imfinzi group confirmed the overall survival rate, which improved to 24% compared to the placebo group. The total survival rate at the time of two years was also consistently 23.6% and 11.5% in the impingement group and the placebo group, respectively. Based on these findings, the NCCN recommends Imfinzi as the standard treatment (Category 1) in the primary treatment for local progressive or metastatic biliary tract cancer. "Biliary cancer is cancer with a poor prognosis, with no clear symptoms and a recurrence rate of 60-70%, and Korea has a relatively high incidence of biliary tract cancer in the world," said Oh Do-yeon, a general researcher at TOPAZ-1 at Seoul National University Hospital.
<
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
>